A staggering 33-million-plus likes can be found at The Fast and Furious 6 Facebook page. By comparison, Iron Man 3's page has fewer than half of that. Star Trek: Into Darkness? Just 2.7 million. The much anticipated Superman reboot Man of Steel comes in with just 621,000. The Fast and Furious
franchise isn't just a blockbuster, money-generating film series—its a
lifestyle franchise. It's the perfect marriage of big balls, small
bikinis, bad guys with good hearts and, most importantly, automobile
porn. It is, in no understated terms, America's id.
Dodge is once again partnering with that id, continuing what might be
one of the most successful product placement partnerships in film
history. This time Dodge is hoping to rub some Furious id off on its Dart and Challenger models. And it might. But Fast and Furious will always be about the Charger.
For Fast and Furious 6, Dodge has announced "co-branded
national, local and multicultural advertising campaigns—events, gaming,
social media and merchandising." This will include national TV campaigns
as well as tie-ins such as in-game promotions
in the game Car Town which allow users to unlock a 2013 Dodge Charger
SRT8. The film will also feature Dodge's new Charger and Challenger
models as well as a classic Daytona. Licensed products will also be part
of Dodge's most expansive Fast and Furious partnership to
date. And why not? The movie franchise could be credited as much as
anything else with the successful relaunch of the moribund Charger
model.
Today, it's hard to remember that the Charger was literally dead for
20 years after 1987 and that it hasn't been a car associated with
toughness or muscle since the late 1970s. Young Charger fans today
should probably count themselves lucky to have missed the 1980s Charger,
a compact, front wheel drive hatchback, including the special edition
Dodge Shelby Charger, which boasted a whopping 105 horsepower engine.
(The latest 2013 Charger comes standard at 300 hp.)
Courtesy of BrandChannel.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Questions, comments, concerns?